Path to net zero must not lead to zero homes

Proposals from the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) to introduce higher Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) for the private rented sector (PRS) raise serious concerns about the practicality, affordability, and likely impact on housing availability. In Propertymark’s response to consultation, informed by input from over 350 members from England and Wales, we insist the UK Government must work closely with the sector to design a fair and sustainable route to energy efficiency.

Energy Efficiency

Summary of the proposals

The consultation proposes a shift to a new Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) metric following EPC reform. This would introduce more ambitious MEES requirements, including:

  • New standards based on a fabric performance metric and either a smart readiness or heating system metric.
  • A cost cap of £15,000 per property for energy efficiency improvements.
  • A phased timeline requiring new tenancies to comply by 2028, and all tenancies by 2030.
  • Obligations for landlords to commission new EPCs before and after works.
  • Potential regulation of short-term lets and exemptions tied to affordability and property type.
EPC on a tablet
10 Dec 2024
Proposed overhaul of Energy Performance Certificates will impact the entire property sector

Realism, support, and flexibility are vital

Propertymark strongly supports efforts to improve housing energy efficiency but warns that these goals must be realistic, properly supported, and considerate of the sector’s diverse nature. We have long advocated for a measured, practical approach to energy efficiency, calling for well-funded, targeted policy that improves housing standards without destabilising the PRS.

We will continue to engage with DESNZ and keep members informed as the proposals progress.

Reforming EPC metrics

We agree that the current EPC system is outdated and welcome a move to more accurate metrics. However, the proposed “fabric-first” approach  disadvantage older, rural, and heritage properties unfairly. These homes are more costly and complex to upgrade and may require extensive works that disrupt tenants or prove unfeasible.

Solid Wall Insulations.jpg
15 May 2025
Climate goals must balance with property industry's practicalities
Cost cap concerns

We oppose the proposed £15,000 cost cap and  recommend a more realistic £5,000 limit. Our survey of members shows overwhelming concern that the higher cap will price landlords out of the market or lead to rent hikes that ultimately harm tenants. A lower cap would support affordability and allow landlords to make incremental, impactful improvements.

Implementation timeline

We recommend a single compliance date of 2030 for all tenancies—new and existing. This approach avoids confusion, gives landlords sufficient time to plan and upgrade properties, and aligns with the sector’s need for more trained tradespeople. We also support incentives for early compliance and urge investment in the green skills workforce.

Cold woman wrapped in blanket next to radiator
17 Oct 2024
Most inefficient homes to get fully funded upgrades from local grant scheme
Grant funding and affordability

A major barrier to achieving energy targets is funding. Due to a lack of awareness, most landlords have not accessed existing schemes , eligibility barriers, or cumbersome application processes. We call for more accessible, well-publicised, and appropriately tailored funding options.

Heat pump being installed
13 May 2025
Planning restrictions scrapped for heat pumps and EV chargers
Exemptions and flexibility

We support an extended 10-year exemption period and recommend further exemptions for listed buildings, properties with recent EPC improvements, and cases where proposed upgrades increase energy costs. We also propose exemptions where tenants do not consent to disruptive works.

Impact on supply

Landlords are already leaving the sector due to rising regulatory pressures. Our members warn that these new requirements could accelerate this trend, especially in low-value areas where returns on investment are limited. This risks the availability of rental stock and undermining the very aims of the policy.

Read our full consultation response