The panel members were Mr Jim Atkins PPNAEA (Honoured) (member panellist acting as the Chairperson for the Tribunal), Ms Jacqueline Stone FNAEA (member panellist) and Mr Noel Hunter OBE (lay panellist).
The presenting Case Officer for Propertymark was Miss Farrah Gibson. Mr Schlagman was not in attendance at the hearing.
Allegations
The Tribunal considered the allegations set out in the case summary sent to our members.
It was alleged that they had acted in contravention of the requirements of the following Propertymark Conduct and Membership Rules.
- Conduct Rule 13: General duty to uphold high standards of ethical and professional behaviour
- 13.1.3. In any other way brings Propertymark or any of its divisions or subsidiaries into disrepute.
- Conduct Rule 14: Duty to assist in Disciplinary Proceedings
- Conduct Rule 21: Continuing Professional Development (CPD)
Decisions
The Tribunal considered the submissions from the Case Officer and the bundle of evidence and after deliberation came to the following findings:
- Conduct Rule 13.1.3: Proven
- Conduct Rule 14: Proven
- Conduct Rule 21: Proven
Sanctions
- Conduct Rule 13.1.3: £500
- Conduct Rule 14: £400
- Conduct Rule 21: £200
In addition, the costs of this hearing of £457 were imposed against Mr Schlagman in favour of Propertymark.
Closing Statement
The Tribunal made the following statement:
'We are disappointed that Mr Schlagman did not attend today’s hearing and has not, at times, responded or cooperated with our disciplinary procedure.'
Download the full report
The downloadable report shows the full details of the rules involved in this case.
